Rethinking Bretton Woods | Sat, Dec 18, 2010
[Download article in pdf format]
With globalization, “What you see is not what you get” is one of the messages of a recently-launched WTO staff paper that, written by Andreas Maurer and Christophe Degain, aims at promoting a debate on the best way to measure trade flows.
“The objective of official merchandise trade statistics is to describe adequately economic phenomena
Rethinking Bretton Woods | Thu, Nov 11, 2010
Two reports were released before the G20 Summit: one by the WTO on G20 trade developments, and another jointly prepared by the OECD and UNCTAD on G20 investment developments. Both reports covered the period from May through October of 2010.
Rethinking Bretton Woods | Fri, Sep 3, 2010
A few months ago the IMF was issuing a staff paper “Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy.” (IMF 2010).
Most of the attention drawn by the paper was related to what was considered a dramatic departure from Central Bank orthodoxy. This was the possibility of accepting the targeting of inflation at 4, rather than 2 percent—generally on the grounds that having a higher inflation would give policy-makers more room to cut rates in a recession, before the rates hit zero.
Rethinking Bretton Woods | Fri, May 28, 2010
This volume, co-published by Center of Concern and the Sistema Economico Latinoamericano y del Caribe (SELA), gathers selected presentations delivered at a consultation with Ministers and senior officials from governments of the Latin America/ Caribbean region.
Rethinking Bretton Woods | Mon, Mar 29, 2010
In 2000 all countries committed to developing a Global Partnership for Development. Speaking at a symposium hosted by Harvard University Law School, 10 years later, RBW Project Director Aldo Caliari presents a paper co-authored with Mac Darrow, Coordinator of the Human Rights and MDGs Unit of the OHCHR. The paper examines whether the Global Partnership for Development lived up to the human rights obligations of the international community.
Rethinking Bretton Woods | Thu, Oct 29, 2009
Over the summer, the IMF revised its Guidance Note for implementing Bilateral Surveillance of Members. The changes respond to some criticisms about the 2007 Decision on Bilateral Surveillance. But how much do such changes really achieve? is a question that this article tries to answer.
Global Women's Project | Wed, Feb 11, 1998
"Trade policies have different consequences on women and men because women and men differ in their economic and social status. Women and men respond differently to economic and trade policies because they have different sets of private resources and levels of access to public ones. Status and control over resources are intricately woven into the sexual division of labor, the assignment of productive and reproductive roles. Thus, the economic impact of trade policy on the genders must look at price and quantity effects as they relate to the differential status of men and women and their different sets of resources. Meanwhile, the social and human development impact of trade policy must look at how choice sets have been altered and how alterations have affected women and men. Both kinds of impact analysis, in turn, help determine the changes in the welfare of both genders."